Should Treliving Continue as GM?

TORONTO (Dec. 22) — With the Maple Leafs, three days before Christmas, sitting but three points above last place in the National Hockey League standings, it is fair to wonder whether the battery of general manager Brad Treliving and coach Craig Berube can move the club forward. Each is hijacked by the nonsensical contracts awarded Auston Matthews and William Nylander, who have been embarrassingly silent in the month of December.

It was Treliving that held the proverbial gun to his own head by re-signing the duo to their current pacts, thoroughly relinquishing his ability to manage. Matthews has eight points this month; Nylander zero goals. The first of several lambs got sacrified earlier today when the Coach Killers saw to it that assistant Marc Savard was fired. Yes, grade–school children playing hockey on the street could perform more efficiently than the Leafs powerplay, of which he oversaw, yet the utter laziness and nonchalance of the “big gunners” could hardly be blamed on Savard, among the most creative passers during his NHL playing career with the Rangers, Calgary, Atlanta and Boston (seasons of 74, 69, 63 and 63 assists). I made it clear in my previous blog (https://bit.ly/4oXIta5) — by many lengths, the most widely read in the 14–year history of this website — that Matthews and Nylander lack the character and determination to drag the Leafs out of their season–long funk. As such, Berube will soon be replaced by Peter DeBoer. But, should Treliving possess the authority to change coaches? Or, should he also be shown the exit door? It’s unlikely Brad could have walked away from the regular–season superstars, given that Brendan Shanahan still presided over the hockey club and would have knighted Matthews and Nylander. But, to offer complete contractual control to players that routinely wither and vanish when the stakes increase was nothing shy of insane. And, that falls on Treliving. Without question — and as resolutely shown again this month — Matthews couldn’t lead a starving man to the dinner table. Nylander, who stays to the perimeter at the best of times, has lost his willingness to skate and fire the puck. Both men are stealing money from Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment. And, therefore, from the long–tortured fan base. It’s been disgraceful… and brutal to watch.

Without question, this season’s lack of accomplishment by the Maple Leafs has resulted from the apathy of their best players. At no point since I’ve been watching the club — and this includes the rot of the 1980’s under Harold Ballard — has a duo so grossly abdicated responsibility. Matthews and Nylander profess to be confused, yet neither will look to where the answer resides: in the mirror. Without a trace of leadership or clutch performance from the big–money boys, others have fallen in line. Matthew Knies, touted by the adoring Toronto media as the next Gordie Howe, has one goal in December. The aging and willing John Tavares has two. Matthews has five, but refused to even marginally compete in recent losses to Edmonton and Washington. The captain hasn’t shown his face in weeks and should feel utterly humiliated. Even amid his hardwired, career–long indifference. So, of course coaches need to be sacrificed when complacency sets in among “franchise superstars” that cannot be touched.


Trades aren’t abundant in the salary cap era and those that are made must be evaluated in hindsight. No person watching the Maple Leafs can possibly understand why Treliving offloaded first–round draft picks in deadline deals for Scott Laughton and Brandon Carlo. If the Leafs actually felt they were a couple of depth additions removed from challenging for the Stanley Cup, they received quite a comeuppance in Games 5 and 7 of the Florida series.

In fact, the Maple Leafs are three impact players removed from such a level, given that Matthews, Nylander and Morgan Rielly have been complete non–factors in the first half of the season. After every no–show, Matthews talks about the “process” and the “positives” to be derived from lopsided defeats. There isn’t a trace of  comprehension in his DNA. Nylander tries to keep things light and has a delightful personality. But, he also refuses to break a sweat. So, honestly, what could any coach accomplish when saddled with floaters at the apex of the roster?

And, remember, this is nothing new, even if exaggerated through the first half of the schedule. Shanahan, Kyle Dubas and Treliving were all savvy enough to spot players with whom they could not seriously challenge. Yet, through obstinacy and blind hope, they kept returning to the same empty well. Nothing has changed under the stewardship of MLSE president Keith Pelley. The situation has only deteriorated. All involved are in a deep state of paralysis, save for today’s ritual sacrifice of Marc Savard. One gets the feeling that a major detonation of the front office is on the horizon. Unless ownership possesses the same torpor and disregard as Matthews and Nylander.

Which would likely surprise not a soul.

EMAIL: HOWARDLBERGER@GMAIL.COM

14 comments on “Should Treliving Continue as GM?

  1. Sadly this is one big joke.
    The captain is more interested in mens wear than he is fighting for hardware.
    This GM had a long history of overpaying for past performance before he was hired here and surprise, with stupid trades, now the cupboard is completely bare.
    The coach who should have been hired was Joel Quenneville not Berube.
    I could go on and on…………..Groundhog Day.

  2. EXACTLY!! I entirely agree with every word and not because of this article but rather, I’ve been saying such in many comments forever. Shanahan destroyed the Leafs for the past 10 years. Although it was insane, Treliving was most likely forced to sign the contracts as he did with those NMCs! Matthews and Nylander contracts mean they must lead but neither one is a leader. They don’t listen to leaders such as their coaches either. They must go before the Leafs can afford true leaders who rise to the occasion in challenging times such as Gilmour, Roberts, Clark, Sittler, McDonald and Salming. Those were our HEROES, not these two personal achievement fairweather losers. It’s in even their best interest to waive their NMCs.

  3. Howard, thanks for continuing to hold feet to the fire at MLSE and for writing such good stuff. Here’s my advice for Pelley. Hire Mats Sundin as team president and Curtis Joseph as his assistant. Dare to consider tanking if your lost first-round pick in 2026 is lottery protected. Make sure the guy you fired three days before Christmas gets a giant severance package. Put a five-pound weight on a string, tie it to the shaft of a hockey stick and put it in Morgan Rielly’s stocking. More than anything, though, be bold. And truly, honestly, no fingers crossed, make winning a Stanley Cup the objective. You say it is but it isn’t. We can tell – and we deserve better.

    1. That would be a Christmas miracle or Hanukkah happenstance! The MLSE executives would only make a decision like that by accident.
      Would a “serious” hockey executive take the job? Between reporting to Keith Pelly, keeping the marketing department happy by retaining the marketable stars regardless the cost/competitive outcome, and ensuring constantly increasing stream of revenue it becomes less about championships and more about corporate goals or objectives.

  4. I said it at the time and I will say it again, John Tavares was the perfect Captain/Spokesman for the team, he handled the job admirably, there was no pressing need or arguable reason to make Matthews the Captain, no slight on Auston who I still believe is a great player, but maybe the captaincy caused him to overthink his game, it was a foolish mistake that didn’t need to happen, that’s on Treliving

    1. I don’t think that was Trelivings decision to make. I think the true power lies in the marketing department, and they’re the ones that wanted their shiny bauble to be captain. Same goes for the reticence to trade one of the flawed stars in past years.

  5. When our biggest problems are trying to get our highest paid forward and defenceman ‘the right people to play with’ we are in trouble.
    I never thought Trev was very good. But he can’t score goals or play D, so we’re still screwed.
    Matthews makes $7-8,000 per minute played? Highest paid in NHL? He is being beaten in the scoring race by 110 players…including 3 ROOKIES.
    No, move on from all three.
    It doesn’t matter to me though.
    After 72 years, I have seen enough.
    I won’t watch a game until Leafs go undefeated in 10 games. (Holding breath)
    Otherwise I just resign myself to the Leafs being content with finishing second in every game.

    I have enough of superstars. Matthews is great. But he won’t bring Toronto a championship before he leaves. Neither will Reilly or Trev.

    1. Good decision, dude. This team doesn’t deserve interest. I find myself less interested in games lately myself, especially when the two top superstars on the team are deadbeat losers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by Comment SPAM Wiper.