Better Hope Kyle Was Fudging

TORONTO (Aug. 13) — Let us compare words spoken, this week, by general managers of teams eliminated during the best–of–five qualifying round in the 2020 Stanley Cup playoffs.

First, from Hall–of–Fame builder Jim Rutherford of the Pittsburgh Penguins; his team the last to record consecutive National Hockey League championships (2016–2017). After a qualifying upset against Montreal: “It was so disappointing in Game 4. You’re waiting for the desperation at the drop of the puck. It didn’t come in the first period. It didn’t come in the second period. And it was even worse in the third period. There’s something wrong if you don’t have the drive to win at that point in the series. Changes need to be made.”

Then, from Kyle Dubas of the Toronto Maple Leafs, whose team gagged on a 3–2 series lead against Boston last spring; then couldn’t hit the backside of a barn against Columbus in the qualifier this year, despite four forwards gobbling up more than $40 million of cap space: “I think the players who we have committed the salaries to are all extremely talented players. They all produce. They are continuing — especially Auston and Mitch and William, who are all very young — to improve and get better. [We will] not overreact, even though that may be what people want when things don’t go as smoothly as you envisioned.”


As mentioned a gazillion times in this corner — and during many of the 17 years I covered the Leafs for The FAN–590 — urgency is not part of the franchise DNA. Here in Toronto, the business model looks after itself, unlike in Pittsburgh, where the Penguins drew flies in the calamitous years before Mario Lemieux arrived (in 1984) and Sidney Crosby (in 2005). Rutherford knows he has to keep his club near the top of the NHL or local interest in hockey will plummet. Pittsburgh, as everyone recognizes, is a Steelers town. The Leafs, by comparison, could dress 20 mannequins and fill Scotiabank Arena. As such, there is not even a hint of remorse or liability from the GM after his team loses in the first elimination round for a fourth consecutive year, extending a franchise–record drought to 16 seasons. Rutherford, with three Stanley Cups on his resume (the first, with Carolina, in 2006) is upset and will make changes. Dubas “still believes” in a core group that withers every year, like clockwork, in April and competes only sporadically. Why? Because he can.

Consequently, the only hope for Leafs Nation is that Dubas was fudging his words so as to not verbally depreciate assets; that he really doesn’t view his current roster as the eighth holy sacrament. But, I wouldn’t wager on it. Not after obsessively engorging the Leafs with skillful, passive workers that have choked off his roster maneuverability at the expense of dogged, determined players that rise to the occasion between April and June (August and October in this pandemic season). Even the most impassioned Maple Leafs observer knows the club has to ditch at least one major salary this summer in order to allow for a shred of roster balance in 2020–21. Yet, Dubas — apparently stubborn beyond reason — strongly hinted that all of John Tavares (who cannot be moved), Mitch Marner (who can, but shouldn’t be), Auston Matthews (going nowhere for the next four seasons) and William Nylander (by far, the most–obvious trade chip) will return, despite the playoff bungling since 2017. If true, Leaf fans, get ready to rinse and repeat a year from now.


Interestingly, though unsurprisingly, there wasn’t a word written about the Leafs goaltending conundrum in end–of–season media dispatches. This was expected from those that cover the Leafs for team–owned TSN and Sportsnet… and from other cheerleaders in the mainstream media. Unless I missed it, however, I expected to read something about the club’s most–grievous playoff obstacle from such–astute columnists as Dave Feschuk (Toronto Star), Steve Simmons (Toronto Sun) and Cathal Kelly (Globe and Mail). I can therefore only assume the local hockey media believes the team can challenge for the Stanley Cup with Frederik (Soft Goal) Andersen — a preposterous claim. If keeping Andersen for the final year of his $5 million contract is the path of least resistance, expect Dubas to comply. Same, apparently, with his Big 4 forwards. It will be easier to reassemble for another futile attempt with the same group than to acknowledge any misjudgment and go back on such an absurd vow as telling Nylander (without a corresponding contract clause) that he won’t be traded. I mean, what is there to risk by standing pat? Nothing economical, I can assure you.

And, what about Brendan Shanahan, who anointed Dubas to the manager’s chair in place of Lou Lamiriello? If the Leafs come up lame again next season, how could Shanahan fire his personal boy wonder and then look himself in the mirror? And, despite a six–year contract extension last summer, how much longer will Shanahan be the apple of Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment’s eye… should his club continues to fizzle?

At the moment, these are questions without answers.


6 comments on “Better Hope Kyle Was Fudging

  1. I sincerely hope our young GM doesn’t use his three strikes stubbornly doubling down on failed strategies and bad moves. Mistakes are an essential part of growth, but only if one learns from them.

  2. Howard

    as Yoda likes to say “Grab the bull by the Horns – He must”

    I recall the time that a Young JFJr was presented with a deal to land Chris Pronger (from Edmonton) for assets the Leafs would later go on to flush down the dumper. To this day I’m convinced that blunder cost Toronto a cup(s). “No riskit = No Bisket”

    Having a puck moving, crease clearing, pugalistic, rearguard with all the charm of an angry prison guard does wonders for both the defensive and offensive parts of the game. Who doesn’t hate Chara??? Everyone on the Bruins and the city of Boston.

    I don’t like the results but I do admire the way Shanahan has built the team through the draft. I also like the approach that Dubas took to scouting, and development. Ever since the Leafs picked Clark Toronto has seemed to whiff on picks whereas a team like Detroit have seemed to find gold nuggets in later rounds.

    That soft goal Anderson let in Game 1 potentially cost them the series. The nicest way you could describe it is “Rookie Mistake” – The only issues are Anderson’s not a rookie and he makes $5 million cannoli’s per year.

    Toronto has to take a look at all options at goalie. I belive Dubas had planned on Garett Sparks developing into the top NHL goalie. He hasn’t recovered from that misstep yet. It will have to be addressed this offseason.

    I firmly believe that Dubas is going to get a shot at trading for or acquiring a Top Line rear-guard this year. Perhaps he’ll win the the Byfuglien
    sweeps (if there is a sweeps). At any rate, Dubas’s next trade will define his worth in Toronto.

    I do concur with you assessment that Nylander will have to go. Yes, he’s a streaky player with skill but he’s hasn’t done anything for us in the playoffs. He’s better off staring on Broadway or in Montreal where they are looking for their next offesive star. Playing number 1 fiddler should see him hit carreer highs in minutes and points. It will be painful to see him succeed elsewhere but he’s never going to get those minutes and starring role in Toronto.

  3. Dubas has won what? One playoff series in the CHL. His teams are not built to win in the playoffs. They are a dandy group to get through the regular season but that’s about it. Factually, if you consider 3v3 ot and shootout as ties, this is a .500 team unfortunately.

    His metrics might be on the mark where speed and skill are concerned but he has not factored in the
    intangibles….Heart, Grit and Character.

    This group needs to mature quickly. As for Matthews….stop worrying about reporters and which outfit you’ll wear to the game. Get some jam bud!

  4. Dubas sets the tone for the roster. I’ve been saying it for 2 years now. Smart as he may be, he is not the right choice to steer this ship. He’s going to fritter away the last remaining years of JT’s prime, and the peak years of Matthews, all to prove he knows something the rest of us don’t. (Spoiler, he doesn’t)

    I don’t understand it. He’s never won a thing. One series in the O. Sure he won as Marlies “GM” but to me that’s the equivalent of cutting the ribbon to open a new shopping mall.

    It’s not as if he was flipping any high end prospects to the San Antonio Rampage, or Syracuse Crunch.

    I was hopeful of the Shanaplan, it looked to be headed to a good space in 2017, but in the back of my mind I always suspected they’d drive the 18 wheeler off a cliff. Naming Dubas GM was the equivalent of the passenger grabbing the steering wheel and jerking it to the right.

    Fire Kyle Dubas. I get teams that are successful don’t turnover management this quickly, but good teams identify mistakes and rectify them before too much time is wasted, or damage done.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by Comment SPAM Wiper.