Easy Path Ahead For Invisible Auston

TORONTO (May 31) — Come on. You didn’t expect Brendan Shanahan to make a bold hire, did you?

Brad Treliving has the experience Shanahan was seeking in the “new” general manager of the Toronto Maple Leafs. Given, however, the assuring phone call Brendan made to his precious nucleus of forwards, Treliving needed to answer “yes” only one question: “Will you throw yourself at the feet and mercy of Auston Matthews and his negotiators?” Looking for re–employment in the National Hockey League, and with likely his only offer, what was Treliving to say? “No, I’m going to make every effort to trade Auston before July 1 so he doesn’t become the de facto GM of this team?” A strong applicant with a self–mandate to shake the Leafs out of their playoff doldrums might have replied in such a manner. Whereupon Shanahan would have said: “Thanks. Don’t call us. We’ll call you.” A hand–me–down candidate with a spotty record in the NHL would take no–such chance.

So, the Maple Leafs have their successor to Kyle Dubas. A manager receiving a second opportunity in the bigs whose team in Calgary missed the playoffs four times in nine seasons while failing to escape the second round of the Stanley Cup tournament. A GM who lost, last summer, his two best players: Matthew Tkachuk to a hands–tied swap with Florida and Johnny Gaudreau to Columbus in free agency. Does it sound familiar, Leafs Nation? Is this an example of your beloved team possessing a courageous and resolute long–term plan to finally challenge for the Stanley Cup? Or, one that assures a path of least resistance toward retaining Invisible Auston and his running mates for an unprecedented eighth consecutive chance to wither early in the playoffs? You answer the question.

Don’t look for any help in the local or national media. It took only minutes, late last night, for TSN hockey analyst Frank Corrado to affirm (alongside the venerable Jay Onrait) that Treliving “checks many boxes” as GM of the Leafs. That the hockey club is co–owned by the parent company of TSN (Bell Canada) wouldn’t enter the equation, would it? You can expect similar platitudes from such other Leaf wall–flowers as Chris Johnston, Kevin McGran, Luke Fox, Mark Masters… heck, maybe even James Mirtle and Jonas Siegel, if they are no longer sitting shiva for Dubas. Steve Simmons, Cathal Kelly and Dave Feschuk offer hope for some reporting balance, but they’ll be trounced by the talking heads who gush over Treliving in the coming days. We live in an era of media “branding”, not one of critical analysis. So, expect an easy path to the podium for the former Calgary manager.


This is not to imply that Treliving will fail here in town. From all reports, he’s a good man who knows the game and the business. He deserves a full chance… even if the 16th GM of the Maple Leafs since 1967, following Punch Imlach (twice), Jim Gregory, Gerry McNamara, Gord Stellick, Floyd Smith, Cliff Fletcher (twice), Ken Dryden, Pat Quinn, John Ferguson, Brian Burke, David Nonis, Lou Lamoriello and Dubas. Given that Gregory (1969–79) and McNamara (1981–88) consumed 17 years of the post–’67 era, the other 14 existed in a span of 39 years. Or, just more than one for every three seasons. Hardly a mark of franchise stability. The biggest threat to Treliving is that which I mentioned off the top: remaining fully subordinate to Matthews, who erupted with a clutch and colossal zero goals in the five–game playoff duster by Florida, continuing a seven–year interval of ineptitude when the stakes increase. A strong–willed GM, working for a new president with fresh ideas, might challenge Invisible Auston’s hold on the franchise, which becomes all–consuming a month from now (July 1), when his celebrated no–movement clause kicks in. But, a conveniently recycled GM operating under a Teflon president with one playoff–round triumph in nearly a decade isn’t likely to stand in the way of vaunted No. 34. Particularly with the raging love affair toward Matthews in the soft and mushy Toronto hockey media. Really, it’s a slam–dunk scenario.

Matthews and his reps will likely toy with the Leafs, coercing the club into either a max–term (eight year) contract, or a “bridge” deal of three–to–four years, at max salary and cap constraint. After all, no player on Earth can sub for Invisible Auston, especially after mid–April. Right? To retain Matthews, the Maple Leafs may need to offload perhaps their most–gifted performer of the 56–year Stanley Cup famine. But, there’s enough anti–Mitch Marner bias amid the fan base for Shanahan and Treliving to make the ultimate mistake. Even if that becomes nearly impossible once Marner’s no–move privilege takes effect, also on July 1. That Mitch still has two years remaining on his current pact — compared to one season for Matthews — could open the door for a bad trade.

But, Marner will need to offer his approval if not moved by Canada Day.

So, Leafs fans, as long as you’re content with Invisible Auston running the show, you’ll be happy with the combo of Shanahan and Treliving. But, you’ll also continue to watch other teams compete for hockey’s biggest prize.


10 comments on “Easy Path Ahead For Invisible Auston

  1. Is Kyle D prohibited from attending / participating in the upcoming draft for Pittsburgh? Calgary made it a condition of Treliving’s departure that he couldn’t be involved in the draft for any new employer. I haven’t seen anything that indicates Kyle is subject to the same condition. Given that Kyle, I believe, will still technically be under contract with Toronto until July 1st, I hope Brendan had the foresight to place a similar restriction on Kyle.

  2. I cannot imagine a world where Lou Lamorello or Steve Yzerman to name just two, would allow a player who has really accomplished nothing, hold the franchise hostage.
    To hear the Leaf fanboy reporters insist the first order of business is to sign Matthews is ridiculous. The first order of business is to trade him for depth. It will cost you regular season points but those players will deliver in the playoffs. Unlike gentle Auston.

  3. You have to wonder if Treliving was the reason
    Matthew Tkachuk wanted out of Calgary. It was a good decision by Tkachuk who now is on the cusp of winning the Stanley Cup.

    1. What in the world would Treliving have to do with wanting to leave Calgary. They played for Sutter and by all accounts most were not fond of him. He is American and did not want to play in Canada. He specifically wanted to go to Florida.

  4. Don’t worry Howie, the Leafs won’t trade Mitch because then Auston likely wouldn’t re-sign.

    They will play it safe and trade Nylander and use his $6.9. To cover raises for #34 & 16

    Firing Dubas was two years too late.

    PS – Why so much affection for Marner?

    1. Reason for Marner “affection”? As written, only Borje Salming and Doug Gilmour – in the half-century I’ve watched the Leafs – compare with respect to hockey skill and instinct. I think Matthews holds him back in the playoffs. Mitch tries to do too much.

  5. “Invisible Auston” describes him perfectly. Trade him before July. The return won’t be great but at least you’ll get something, because I guarantee you he’s walking after next season.

  6. I want to see how long it’ll take for Treliving to make a move we don’t like. May take longer for him to make a move we do like, though. I hope they don’t cow to Matthews. Keep him, let him play out his final year and if you re-sign him, do so for the right amount of money. Making him the top paid player in the league would not be the right amount of money. I say pay him 9.5 million per year, which is what the Tampa Bay lightning stars are making, and Matthews is not better than any of them. That would be a 2 million dollar pay cut. And if he walks, he walks. Don’t trade him now though. That would be a desperate move. It would be too easy on Matthews. Make it difficult for him by letting him make the move.

    1. I was thinking the same thing. Either Bettman or the MLSE board.

      There were so many ways Shanahan could have gone but he went with the guy who blew up the Calgary Flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by Comment SPAM Wiper.