Autocracy to Prevail at Sportsnet

TORONTO (Apr. 1) — What the MAGA man wants, the MAGA man gets.

In this case, the monolith of Toronto professional sport. Soon to be the domain of Edward Rogers, the Donald Trump zealot and Mar–a–Lago frequenter that owns 100 percent of the Blue Jays and the stadium in his family’s name; by this summer, gobbling up 75 percent of Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, garnering him control over the Leafs, Raptors, Toronto FC and the Argonauts. Only the Toronto Sceptres (women’s hockey) is beyond King Edward’s reach. As it turned out, there was no chance the King would allow himself to be outbid for Canadian television rights to the National Hockey League. Not while having the country’s most–watched team under his thumb. MLSE would be a corner grocery store without the incomparable might of the Leafs’ logo. In the end, such American–based streaming outlets as Prime and Netflix found the rights fee ($11 billion CAD over 12 seasons, beginning in 2026–27) too rich. Hockey sells, but not like football, basketball and baseball. The return wouldn’t match the financial commitment. Neither will it for King Eddie, but complete control of the city’s teams — and the media message emanating from his TV network, Sportsnet — cannot be weighed economically. It will provide Ed Rogers the sort of jurisdiction and fiefdom that his political hero south of the border is busily crafting.

What level of media control are we talking here? Well, as of 9:30 p.m. EDT today, all major outlets (print and electronic) had reported the Rogers’ rights extension. Except for… Rogers. Even TSN, to its enduring credit, discussed the issue as part of its Insider Trading segment. But, King Eddie is carefully scripting how his all–sports people will “break” the big news; likely during the Hockey Night In Canada telecast on Saturday.* Until then, he won’t allow Sportsnet pundits to even pretend that it’s happened. Imagine such–esteemed media types as Ron MacLean, Elliotte Friedman and Nick Kypreos having to play dumb until the overlord says otherwise. This is merely a taste of the rigidity Sportsnet types will be expected to maintain. Once the King gains majority interest in the Leafs and Scotiabank Arena, all premise of neutrality will disappear. The Leafs could start a season 0–11–3 and the script will be one of “optimism.” Of “not giving up on the boys.” Midweek triumphs over Nashville and San Jose will be celebrated as if deep playoff conquests. Why not make it official and rename the channel Leafsnet?
*King Ed grew tired of other media outlets “beating” Sportsnet to the story. So, an “announcement” was made today.


This should be of concern to viewers, given the impending turmoil of the summer. Another faceplant in the Stanley Cup tournament could spell the end for Brendan Shanahan, about to mark his tenth anniversary as Leafs president. Shanahan’s second contract expires after the current season. Though MLSE has an interminably low standard for its hockey team, on what basis could the company retain the Hall–of–Fame winger after, say, another first–round playoff exit? Then there’s the Mitch Marner saga. Which club will Marner choose in unrestricted free agency if not re–signed by the Maple Leafs prior to July 1? And, what spin will the King insist upon if both scenarios come to roost? It is nigh impossible to imagine any form of objectivity toward the Leafs from commentators that are paid by Edward Rogers. Only with the Blue Jays has King Ed been able to exert his entire influence. All too often, the observations of baseball broadcasters bely what fans are witnessing. If Buck Martinez (let him stay healthy) calls the current Blue Jays “a special team” one more time, I’ll hurl. But, this is what Leaf watchers can now anticipate from Sportsnet until, at minimum, the end of the 2037–38 season. The club’s legion of supporters will reside in a “police” state; the tone of all TV and radio dialogue carefully arranged so that “branding” of the logo is not compromised. As mentioned so frequently, here, this is the most–egrigious conflict–of–interest in Canadian media history. And, it will erode even further when the King’s tentacles infiltrate all of Leafdom — the team, the arena, the network and the pundits. Rather similar to the anarchist escapades of the King’s hero: Heinrich Trump.

Sadly, Sportsnet viewers will be defrauded.

Especially those seeking a balanced narrative when the Leafs go pear–shaped.

Not so, potentially, for rival TSN, which squirms free of MLSE influence once the $4.7 billion transfer of Bell Canada Enterprise’s stake to Rogers goes into effect, likely in July or August. At that time, King Eddie will own 75 percent of the company. TSN, with merely a selection of Leafs regional telecasts as a prerequisite of the sale, will accord viewers a more objective and critical analysis. If it so chooses. In no larger way could the country’s first all–sports network distance itself from Sportsnet. If such familar and respected hockey voices as James Duthie, Pierre Lebrun, Darren Dreger, Mike Johnson and Jeff O’Neill are no–longer beholden to MLSE, TSN will offer a refreshing alternative to those spinning uncontrollably in the Rogers/Sportsnet/Leafs vortex (particularly if Johnson and O’Neill can temper their flagrant partisanship toward the club). It’s an opportunity without national TV rights.


I haven’t yet noticed a positive reaction to the Rogers/NHL contract extension. There is nothing particularly innovative about the hockey presentation on Sportsnet; hasn’t been, really, since the demise of Coach’s Corner in November 2019. Under no circumstance would Ed Rogers, the autocrat, enable the rise of another Don Cherry. Costs too much in money, fame and turmoil. Far easier to offer a frugal, bland (if informative) production during intermission segments. Four people gabbing in a studio is as cheap as it gets. And, a long way from the weekly Cherry–Ron MacLean spoof that literally stopped the nation for seven minutes each Saturday night… or the once–popular Satellite Hot Stove (with MacLean, Al Strachan, John Davidson, the late Red Fisher, and others). If Rogers felt compelled, financially, to strip its media wing of so many recognizable names (Cherry, Glenn Healy, John Shannon, Doug MacLean, Bob McCown) during its first NHL rights deal ($5.2 billion over 12 years), imagine how King Eddie will shred to the bare bones his TV/radio personnel with an outlay of more than twice that figure.

Autocracy began at Rogers when veteran TV executive Scott Moore and an invisible hatchet–man named Paul Ski took over the media wing in 2009. Loyalty and competition gave way to profit margin, enabling Ski to stuff his pockets with bonuses paid for destroying young careers. How pleasant it must be to sleep at night when devoid of conscience. Expect nothing less for those under the employ of King Edward. The Donald Trump wannabe has annexed all of professional sport in this city. Given his reprehensible track record with the Blue Jays, the longest–ever Stanley Cup drought is bound to endure for 65 to 70 years. Which must be thrilling for fans of the Leafs.

EMAIL: HOWARDLBERGER@GMAIL.COM

10 comments on “Autocracy to Prevail at Sportsnet

  1. I cant even watch HNIC on Rogers anymore,the way its presented and and the panel keeps yapping and yelling at the viewers with nonesense and all that. Thank god for my HNIC DVD library from the 1950’s,1960’s,1970’s and 1980’s when ever I want to watch hockey I watch these games from the golden era. No comparison to todays nonesense

  2. Um I know the Leafs and all things Toronto sports Rule but you do realize that the IPL season has been underway since March 22. If you are looking for change look no further. It’s on TV as well.

    Furthermore, all Toronto Teams have my positive vibes and energy in hoping that they succeed just not any of my time or money.

      1. Indian Premier League (cricket).

        On an unrelated note, I wonder how the Rogers deal impacts the Jays resigning Guerrero Jr…. Does Rogers have any money left to spend?

  3. On first glance the deal doesn’t make sense to me – but what do I know? I was under the impression that the real reason all the cuts to personnel like Don Cherry was because Rogers was losing a lot of money on NHL hockey. The only thing I watch now between periods is Elliot Friedman Saturday Headlines as I have a PVR. They also gave the Monday rights to Prime to cut some losses. So logically if they are now paying double when they were already losing the money they will lose even more. The end result will be Canadians paying more to watch the NHL which will piss off a lot of people. Then again it doesn’t seem like Edward Rogers is too concerned about pissing off Canadians being so chummy with Trump. Anyway Rogers deal with the NHL is no concern of mine but what really worries me is there is an out of control lunatic who seems to believe he is king of the world and he is making the world an extremely dangerous place.

  4. Howard,
    I have no idea if Rogers is a Trump fan or just a fart catcher. Like most I know close to nothing about him, but his Blue Jay moves look conflicted. Spends money and willing to spend money, but has a fatal blind spot when it comes to team management. Rogers media is as bad as bell when it comes to product quality. Everything they do on their radio stations seems amateurish and half-assed cheap.
    As for the coverage of the leafs, it’s been a solid 25 years since coverage has been dominated by “positive” fan-like drivel, with an occasional outburst of rational criticism which is quickly drowned out by the faithful on both networks. I don’t find TSN any better than Rogers when it comes to leaf coverage, and I don’t think it’s because they feel their access is threatened but just that they employ former jocks who are fans, and frankly just aren’t that clever.
    All the talking heads at both stations soft pedal discussion of Mathews, Marner and Tavares, less so Nylander, but Sportsnet is a bit worse than tsn. Justin Bourne, has become the worst of them all, and his “blah-blah-blah-STATISTICS!” schtick is just bad radio/podcast and dull analysis.

  5. The Leafs started to lose me in the Peddie era, & the last full game I watched was Game 7 versus the Habs during the Covid playoffs. It all resembles the corporate life that I deal with daily far too much.
    That said, I enjoy your writing as well as the trips down memory lane that you take in your blogs.
    Here’s the question that I’m curious about, though. In light of the “everything is awesome” total control that’s certain to blanket all things Leafs, and given how integral hockey & the team have been to both your personal life as well as your career, at what point does Howard Berger decide that he’s had enough & walks away from it all?

Leave a Reply to JOEL Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by Comment SPAM Wiper.